Authentication and sessions
Login, password reset, multifactor flows, tokens and session-management weaknesses.
WebShield
We investigate how an attacker could bypass authorization, manipulate business workflows or access data that should remain protected.
Manual testing, prioritized reporting and verification after remediation.
An automated scanner is only one tool. Custom behavior, roles and business logic require manual testing.
Login, password reset, multifactor flows, tokens and session-management weaknesses.
Access to other users' data, role bypass, administrative functions and object-level permissions.
Injection, file upload, APIs, webhooks, third-party services and server-side requests.
Manipulation of pricing, discounts, approval and transaction flows that generic tools cannot understand.
Storage, transmission and logging of sensitive information and possible unauthorized access.
Security headers, error handling, secrets, environment settings and unnecessarily exposed functions.
Testing is controlled and performed within an agreed scope.
We agree on targets, roles, timing, prohibited actions and communication paths.
We understand functionality, data flows, trust boundaries and attack surface.
Manual and tool-assisted tests safely verify exploitable vulnerabilities.
You receive evidence, risk priorities and remediation guidance, followed by verification.
A report that both developers and decision makers can use.
Key business risks, affected functions and remediation priorities in a concise format.
Reproducible steps, affected endpoints, request-response examples and impact.
Guidance aligned with the root cause and application architecture, not only a vulnerability label.
No. Automated scanning finds known patterns, while penetration testing also covers manual verification, roles and business workflows.
Yes, with an agreed scope and prohibited actions. A realistic test environment reduces business risk when one is available.
It depends on application size, roles and integrations. A reliable estimate follows a short technical scoping discussion.
Yes. A retest checks whether remediation actually removed the exploitable condition.
Tell us about the application, technology and purpose of the assessment.